Explanation of Disciplinary Possibility of Futures Studies as a Transdisciplinary Field

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student in Futures Studies Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran,

2 Associate Professor of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

3 Full Professor of Political Science, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

4 FullProfessor of Philosophy, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

5 Associate Professor of Future Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: Since futures studies was faced by the challenge of being stablished as a discipline, and many of futurists insisted on the necessity of this matter for futures studies, this research is to analyse disciplinary possibility of futures studies. Also, it is to determine its position between academic disciplines.
Method: At first part of this research, analysing of satisfying disciplinary criteria by futures studies from epistemological, social, and organisaional approaches was used. At second part, position of futures studies between academic disciplines was determined through applying well-known disciplines categories.
Findings: The results showed that futures studies include particular object of inquiry; body of accumulated specialist knowledge; specialized theories and concepts; various practical methods; scientific paradigms; shared discourse, language, peers, identity; and application in action. It was identified that futures studies due to its disciplinary capabilities, can be considered as a discipline and in disciplines categories, it is an applied and soft discipline and is posited in the broader domain of applied social sciences.
Conclusion: While futures studies satisfies disciplinary criteria, it needs to be developed in two areas: first one is development of its philosophical and epistemological foundations, so that it exits from its baseless situation; second one is its academic development at different higher education levels so that to reach its real position in academy.

Keywords

References

Aaltonen, M. (2009). Evaluation and organization of Furturea Research Methodology–V 3.0. Futures research methodology–Version, 3.‏
Aligica, P. D. (2003). Prediction, explanation and the epistemology of future studies. Futures, 35(10), 1027-1040.‏
Argryis, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. (1985). Action science: Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. Josey-Bass, San Francisco.‏
Becher, T. (1989) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 151-161.
Bell, D., & Graubard, S. R. (Eds.). (1997). Toward the year 2000: Work in progress. MIT Press.‏
Bell, W. (2016). Foundations of Futures Studies. Translators: Mostafa Taghavi and Mohsen Mohaghegh. Tehran: Education and Research Institute for Deffence Industries, Center of Futures Studies of Deffence Sciences and Technologies. (in Persian).
Bell, W. (2002). A community of futurists and the state of the futures field. Futures, 34(3-4), 235-247.‏
Bell, W., & Olick, J. K. (1989). An epistemology for the futures field: problems and possibilities of prediction. Futures, 21(2), 115-135.‏
Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of applied Psychology, 57(3), 195.‏
Bishop, P., Hines, A., & Collins, T. (2007). The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques. foresight.‏
Boucher, W. I., & Amara, R. (1977). The study of the future: an agenda for research (Vol. 770036). National Science Foundation.‏
Bradfield, R., Wright, G., Burt, G., Cairns, G., & Heijden, K. V. (2005). The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures, 37(8), 795-812.
Butter, M., Brandes, F., Keenan, M., & Popper, R. (2008). How are foresight methods selected?. foresight.‏Slaughter, R. (1995). The foresight principle: Cultural recovery in the 21st century. Praeger Publishers.‏
Clark, M. (2006). A case study in the acceptance of a new discipline. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 133-148.‏
Coates, J. F. (1985). Foresight in federal government policy making. Futures Research Quarterly, 1(2), 29-53.‏
Cox, M. Z., Daspit, J., McLaughlin, E., & Jones III, R. J. (2012). Strategic management: is it an academic discipline?. Journal of Business Strategies, 29(1).‏
Cuhls, K. (2001). From Forecasting to Foresight Processes. Submission to S, 4.‏
Czerniewicz, L. (2008). Distinguishing the Field of Educational Technology. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6(3), 171-178.‏
Dator, J. (1979). The futures of cultures and cultures of the future. Perspectives on Cross Cultural Psychology, Academic Press, New York, NY, 369-88.‏
Dator, J. (1993). Futures Studies – Tomorrow and Today. Futuribles 4, 1-16.
Dator, J. (1996) Futures Studies as Applied Knowledge. In Slaughter, R. A. (Ed.). (2002). New thinking for a New Millennium: The knowledge base of futures studies. Routledge.‏
Dator, J. (2005), ‘Foreword’, in Slaughter, R., Inayatullah, S., & Ramos, J. (2005). The knowledge base of futures studies: Professional edition. Foresight International.‏
Dator, J. (2012). Futures Studies. In Bainbridge, W. S. (Ed.). (2011). Leadership in science and technology: A reference handbook. Sage Publications.‏
Davoudi, S., & Pendlebury, J. (2010). Centenary paper: The evolution of planning as an academic discipline. Town planning review, 81(6), 613-647.‏
De Burgh, H. (2003). Skills are not enough: The case for journalism as an academic discipline. Journalism, 4(1), 95-112.‏
De Jouvenel, B. (1964). L’Art de la Conjecture (The Art of Conjecture). Monaco: Du Rocher.‏
Del Favero, M. (2003). Academic disciplines. Encyclopedia of education, 9-14.‏
Fergnani, A. (2019). Mapping futures studies scholarship from 1968 to present: A bibliometric review of thematic clusters, research trends, and research gaps. Futures, 105, 104-123.‏
Fergnani, A., & Chermack, T. J. (2020). The resistance to scientific theory in futures and foresight, and what to do about it. Futures & Foresight Science.‏
Floyd, J. (2012). Action research and integral futures studies: A path to embodied foresight. Futures, 44(10), 870-882.‏
Foucault, M. (2012). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage.
Fry, J. (2004). The cultural shaping of ICTs within academic fields: Corpus‐based linguistics as a case study. Literary and linguistic computing, 19(3), 303-319.‏ 319.
Galtung, J. (1984), There Are Alternatives.Spokesman, Nottingham.
Gidley, J. M. (2017). The future: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.‏
Glenn, J. C., & Gordon, T. J. (2003). Futures research methodology. Washington: The.‏
Godet, M. (1993), From Anticipation to Action. Paris: UNESCO.
Godet, M. (2000). The art of scenarios and strategic planning: tools and pitfalls. Technological forecasting and social change, 65(1), 3-22.‏
Goodlad. S. (1979), What Is an Academic Discipline? In Cox, R. (1979). Cooperation and Choice in Higher Education.‏
Hideg, É. (2015). Paradigms in futures field.‏ Budapest: Corvinus University of Budapest.
Hines, A. (2006). Strategic foresight: the state of the art. The futurist, 40(5), 18.‏
Holmes, E. R., & Desselle, S. P. (2004). Is scientific paradigm important for pharmacy education?. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 68(1-5), BJ1.‏
Inayatullah, S. (1990). Deconstructing and reconstructing the future: Predictive, cultural and critical epistemologies. Futures, 22(2), 115-141.‏
Inayatullah, S. (2010). Epistemological pluralism in futures studies: The CLA–Integral debates. Futures, 42(2), 99-102.
Janoff, S., & Weisbord, M. (2006). Future Search as ‘real-time’action research. Futures, 38(6), 716-722.‏
Johnston, R., & Sripaipan, C. (2008). ll. Foresight in Industrialising Asia. The handbook of technology foresight: Concepts and practice, 237.‏
Jones, W. A. (2011). Variation among academic disciplines: An update on analytical frameworks and research. Journal of the Professoriate, 6(1), 9-27.‏
Jouvenel, B. (1967). de (1967) The art of conjecture. New York.‏
Karlsen, J. E., & Karlsen, H. (2013). Classification of tools and approaches applicable in foresight studies. In Recent developments in foresight methodologies (pp. 27-52). Springer, Boston, MA.‏
Kolb, D.A. (1981). Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences. In The modern American College. Jossey-Bass.
Krishnan, A. (2009). What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarity vs. interdisciplinarity debate.‏
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Liles, D. H., Johnson, M. E., Meade, L., & Underdown, D. R. (1995, June). Enterprise engineering: A discipline?. In Society for Enterprise Engineering Conference Proceedings (Vol. 6, No. 1195).‏
Lodahl, J. B., & Gordon, G. (1972). The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments. American sociological review, 57-72.‏
‏Malaska, P. (1995). The futures field of research. Futures Research Quarterly, 11(1), 79-90.‏
Mannermaa, M. (1991). In search of an evolutionary paradigm for futures research. Futures, 23(4), 349-372.‏
Marien, M. (2002). Futures studies in the 21st century: a reality-based view. Futures, 34(3-4), 261-281.
Masini, E. B. (1983). Visions of desirable societies. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Masini, E. (1993). Why futures studies?. Grey Seal Books.‏
Masini, E. B. (2001). New challenges for futures studies. Futures, 33(7), 637-647.‏
Michael, D. N. (1985). With both feet planted firmly in mid-air: Reflections on thinking about the future. Futures, 17(2), 94-103.‏
Miles, I. (2002). Appraisal of alternative methods and procedures for producing Regional Foresight.".‏
Miles, I. (2008). From futures to foresight. The handbook of technology foresight: Concepts and practice.‏
Minkkinen, M. (2020). Theories in Futures Studies: Examining the Theory Base of the Futures Field in Light of Survey Results. World Futures Review, 12(1), 12-25.‏
Müllert, N., & Jungk, R. (1987). Future Workshops: How to create desirable futures. London, United Kingdom: Institute for Social Inventions.‏
Oxford English Dictionary, ‘Discipline’, Online Edition, available at < https://www.oed.com >,
accessed 5 January 2020.
Paya, A. (2018). Critical rationalism as a theoretical framework for futures studies and foresight. Futures, 96, 104-114.
Popper, R. (2008). How are foresight methods selected?. foresight.‏
Ramos, J. M. (2006). Dimensions in the confluence of futures studies and action research. Futures, 38(6), 642-655.‏
Ramos, J. M. (2002). Action research as foresight methodology. Journal of futures studies, 7(1), 1-24.‏
Slaughter, R. A. (1993). The substantive knowledge base of futures studies. Futures-Guildford, 25, 227-227.‏
Slaughter, R. A. (1996). The knowledge base of futures studies as an evolving process. Futures, 28(9), 799-812.‏
Slaughter, R. A. (1998). Futures studies as an intellectual and applied discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(3), 372-385.‏
Slaughter, R. A. (2001). Knowledge creation, futures methodologies and the integral agenda. Foresight-The journal of future studies, strategic thinking and policy, 3(5), 407-418.‏
Slaughter, R. A. (2002). Beyond the mundane: reconciling breadth and depth in futures enquiry. Futures, 34(6), 493-507.‏
Tapio, P., & Hietanen, O. (2002). Epistemology and public policy: using a new typology to analyse the paradigm shift in Finnish transport futures studies. Futures, 34(7), 597-620.‏
Toulmin, S. E. (1963). Foresight and Understanding an Enquiry Into the Aims of Science. Foreword by Jacques Barzun.‏
van der Duin, P. (2009). On applied science, prediction and contingency. Futures, 41(3), 194-196.‏
Van Vught, F. A. (1987). Pitfalls of forecasting: fundamental problems for the methodology of forecasting from the philosophy of science. Futures, 19(2), 184-196.‏
Voros, J. (2003). A generic foresight process framework. foresight.‏
Voros, J. (2005). A generalised “layered methodology” framework. Foresight.‏
Voros, J. (2007). On the philosophical foundations of futures research. In Knowing Tomorrow?: How Science Deals with the Future, 69-90.‏
Voros, J. (2008). Integral Futures: An approach to futures inquiry. Futures, 40(2), 190-201.
Wagar, W. W. (1993). Embracing change: Futures inquiry as applied history. Futures, 25(4), 449-455.
Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences (2nd ed.). New York:
Oxford University Press Inc.
Ylijoki, O. H. (2000). Disciplinary cultures and the moral order of studying–A case-study of four Finnish university departments. Higher education, 39(3), 339-362.‏
Ziauddin, S. (2017). Future: All That Matters. Translator: Mohsen Taheri Damaneh. Tehran: Ayandehpajooh Publications. (in Persian).
Journal of Iran Futures Studies
Volume 8, Issue 1 - Serial Number 14
September 2023
Pages 29-54

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics